I really enjoyed reading Medina’s book, Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School, because it was informative, humorous, and to the point. I found that the “rules” were not necessarily new ideas, but they were well argued and supported by scientific research. For this reason, I found them enlightening and inspiring. The fact that “physically fit children…appear to concentrate better…and allocate more cognitive resources to a task and do so for longer periods of time” (Medina, J., 2008) made me wonder physical education does not have a greater presence and importance in schools and classrooms. It seems that simple changes could make a great difference. For example, teachers could plan lessons so that students move around during the class period. This could take the form of students rotating groups, working at the white board, utilizing alternative seating arrangements such as exercise balls to allow students to fidget in a constructive manner. Ultimately, we need to keep our students active in the classroom in order to stimulate blood flow to the brain.
Meece and Daniels (2008) was also a revealing introduction to the study of students as learners. The first chapter draws attention to fact that teachers are but one influence on child development. There are various other factors such as race, family structure, socio-economic-status, etc., that blend together to influence the development of a child. However, “adolescents spend approximately one-third of their waking hours in school” (Meece, J., & Daniels, D., 2008), which suggests that teachers can contribute significantly to the social development of students. This then necessitates that as a future teacher I need to be knowledgeable about child development and aware of the status of children today. Page 17 in Child & Adolescent Development for Educators presents a portrait of America’s children today. I was shocked by some of the statistics and the challenges they pose to both students and teachers.
A final piece of the reading from this week that I would like to discuss is the “Focus on Teaching” from Meece & Daniels (2008) found on page 10. Since I am an aspiring mathematics teacher I appreciated reading the comparison between mathematics classrooms in America from those in Japan. I think it can be very beneficial to learn from other cultures. The following two lessons I pulled from the excerpt on page 10 of Meece & Daniels (2008).
Lesson 1: American students spend most of their time in mathematics classes acquiring isolated skills through repeated practice. In contrast students in Japan spend as much time solving challenging problems as they do practicing skills.
Lesson 2: In America, the teacher’s role is to break down complex tasks into manageable pieces and to provide plenty of opportunities to practice. By contrast, Japanese teachers find challenging problems to begin the lesson and refrain from showing or telling students how to solve the problem.
Reading about these differences has inspired me to research more about differences in mathematics education across cultures. I believe there is a lot to learn from other cultures and perhaps experiment with different approaches to find what works well. I hope that there will be more readings during this course that discuss mathematics education because I thoroughly enjoyed all of the readings from this week.
Reference List:
Meece, J., & Daniels, D. (2008). Child & adolescent development for educators (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Medina, J. (2009). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and school. Seattle: Pear Press.